top of page

Wax (A Verb)

A Modified Reprint from 2021


Wax is yet another word, another brush stroke on the canvas of accurate communication.  It has been eliminated and replaced for the sake of ‘easy reading.’ But our goal in Bible reading isn't easy reading, our goal is understanding.  Therefore, replacing the instances where wax or waxed are used with more generic words such as grow or grown, essentially dulls and blurs the picture being painted on our mental canvas.


Wax means to grow or increase, but includes an element of time. Wax suggests growth in a typical time period; not suddenly.


“…and it grew, and waxed a great tree” (Luke 13:19).

 

Here, grew and waxed are used together, one revealing increase, the other showing this growth was (unlike Jack’s beanstalk) consistent with the gradual time of a tree’s growth.  When the Israeli nation grew strong, the time it took to grow strong was not instant, but rather as a process of time, as they displaced the Canaanites and others. Notice the qualifier, “And it came to pass” – a typical time frame:


Yet it came to pass, when the children of Israel were waxen strong…”

(Joshua 17:13).


The direct opposite of wax, although not used in the Authorized Version, is wane. As you might expect, wane indicates a gradual decline or weakening (whereas wax is a gradual increase or strengthening).

So now, when we read “…evil men and seducers shall wax worse and worse…” (2 Tim 3:13), we understand this is neither a discussion of poor candle quality, nor a sudden morality problem; it is a sign of the times (the last days– 2 Tim 3:1). It describes a gradual decay of good; and a corresponding steady increase in the ungodly works of evil men.


We could say increases gradually; but why? we already have the exact and efficient word at hand: wax.

 


Recent Posts

See All

5 Comments


Very logical study!

Like

Nick
Nick
Apr 10

Why? Because the English language changes just like every other language in current use. The real question is why would anyone choose to cling to English in a form that hasn't been used for over 400 years? Is the goal to clearly communicate the gospel OR is it to show the world how superior one is because they know words people don't use anymore? Pride? Ego? Wax and wane are still used in more limited ways today but why not spend some actual time discussing words that have changed meaning since the KJV was first published so people don't read those words with 21st century meaning? Far more helpful than worrying about "wax".

Like
Replying to

There is a difference between the “English” and the “American” language. If we would not think to change the original Hebrew and Greek -why would we change the English? The KJV is written in English not American.


If we learn to read Hebrew and Greek we should learn to read English as well. To change any of it is to muddle and meddle with Holy writ. Adding and taking away from scripture is offence to God and comes with consequences. Woe unto all that do.


If we think to improve or take away from Shakespeare it is no longer Shakespeare! If we think to improve, edit or change the scripture as written in English, it is no longer original to…


Like

Thanks for this post... This was a blessing.

Like
bottom of page